Disney Sues YouTube & Ex-Exec Justin Connolly For Breach Of Contract
Justin Connolly, LA Superior Court downtown Disney/Getty Images

Disney Sues YouTube & Ex-Exec Justin Connolly For Breach Of Contract


Corporate poaching never goes over well with Disney and even less so when they lose a key executive like Justin Connolly to the likes of the ever dominating YouTube. Which means, after 20 years at the Walt Disney Company in various capacities, and a 2024 inked employment contract, presumed lifer Connolly is now finding his sudden segue to the Google-owned social media and online video sharing platform a bit bumpier than expected.

Make that preliminary injunction and perhaps permanent injunction bumpy.

In a short but sharp breach of contract suit filed Wednesday in LA Superior Court, the House of Mouse want the courts to stop their recently departed president of Disney Platform Distribution from being able to start his newly created gig as YouTube’s global head of media and sports. Like never start it.

Casting any sentimentality aside regardless of Connolly’s previously long loyal service, and recalling there is a reason they call it show business and not show pals, Disney are insisting that the contractual rules are no game here.

“In April 2025, Disney became aware of YouTube’s offer of employment to Connolly,” says the suit against the exec and the video platform filed by heavyweight employment law firm Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp on May 21 in DTLA. On November 6 last year, Connolly signed a new contract set to kick in on January 1, 2025 and run to December 31, 2027.

That all changed last week.

“This news came at a critical time in Connolly’s tenure as President of Platform Distribution for Disney. Disney is in the midst of several important product launches and renegotiation of some of its largest distribution deals, and Connolly has been the architect of Disney’s distribution strategy and its principal negotiator,” Disney declares in the breach of contract, tortious interference and unfair competition action. “Critically, Connolly leads the Disney team negotiating a license renewal with YouTube. Connolly has intimate knowledge of Disney’s other distribution deals, the financial details concerning Disney’s content being licensed to YouTube, and Disney’s negotiation strategies, both in general and in particular with respect to YouTube.”

Or to put it in the starkest of Magic Kingdom terms: “It would be extremely prejudicial to Disney for Connolly to breach the contract which he negotiated just a few months ago and switch teams when Disney is working on a new licensing deal with the company that is trying to poach him.”

Disney/Getty Images

Both Disney and YouTube declined to comment on the lawsuit when contacted by Deadline today.

In this C-suite game of executive chairs, Connolly exited his Disney post after two decades last Friday, just as the company, as it makes clear in its BOC suit, was nearing a consequential series of negotiations. Connolly was to have played a central role in talks with distribution partners for ESPN‘s forthcoming stand-alone streamer and also, ironically, carriage renewal talks with YouTube TV. The companies’ current agreement expires later this year. 

In fact, the exec was one of several senior leaders at ESPN and Disney (a roster that included CEO Bob Iger) to attend a media briefing last week about ESPN’s streaming strategy. When he circulated a memo later that week announcing his departure, it reportedly took employees by surprise given he had recently re-upped his contract.

Exposing that Connolly’s now past role and responsibilities at Disney was of a “special, unique, unusual, extraordinary, or intellectual character, which gives them peculiar value,” the company was taken the role of the injured party here not disingenuously at first glance.

“As a direct and proximate result of Connolly’s breach of the Employment Agreement, Disney has been harmed and will continue to be harmed,” the Bob Iger-run media colossus asserts in their filing. “Connolly threatens to, and unless restrained, will continue to breach the Employment Agreement, to Disney and its affiliates’ great and irreparable injury, for which damages would not afford adequate relief, in that they would not completely compensate for Disney’s injuries.”

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *